Paper detail

Tracking Changes in Resilience and Level of Coordination in Terrorist Groups

Activity profiles of terrorist groups show frequent spurts and downfalls corresponding to changes in the underlying organizational dynamics. In particular, it is of interest in understanding changes in attributes such as intentions/ideology, tactics/strategies, capabilities/resources, etc., that influence and impact the activity. The goal of this work is the quick detection of such changes and in general, tracking of macroscopic as well as microscopic trends in group dynamics. Prior work in this area are based on parametric approaches and rely on time-series analysis techniques, self-exciting hurdle models (SEHM), or hidden Markov models (HMM). While these approaches detect spurts and downfalls reasonably accurately, they are all based on model learning --- a task that is difficult in practice because of the "rare" nature of terrorist attacks from a model learning perspective. In this paper, we pursue an alternate non-parametric approach for spurt detection in activity profiles. Our approach is based on binning the count data of terrorist activity to form observation vectors that can be compared with each other. Motivated by a majorization theory framework, these vectors are then transformed via certain functionals and used in spurt classification. While the parametric approaches often result in either a large number of missed detections of real changes or false alarms of unoccurred changes, the proposed approach is shown to result in a small number of missed detections and false alarms. Further, the non-parametric nature of the approach makes it attractive for ready applications in a practical context.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.