Paper detail

Tracing the Top-of-the-atmosphere and Vertical Cloud Structure of a fast-rotating late T-dwarf

Only a handful of late-T brown dwarfs have been monitored for spectro-photometric variability, leaving incomplete the study of the atmospheric cloud structures of the coldest brown dwarfs, that share temperatures with some cold, directly-imaged exoplanets. 2MASSJ00501994-332240 is a T7.0 rapidly rotating, field brown dwarf that showed low-level photometric variability in data obtained with the Spitzer Space telescope. We monitored 2MASSJ00501994-332240 during ~2.6 hr with MOSFIRE, installed at the Keck I telescope, with the aim of constraining its near-infrared spectro-photometric variability. We measured fluctuations with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1.48+\-0.75% in the J-band photometric light curve, an amplitude of 0.62+/-0.18% in the J-band spectro-photometric light curve, and an amplitude of 1.26+/-0.93% in the H-band light curve, and an amplitude of 5.33+/-2.02% in the CH_4-H_2O band light curve. Nevertheless, the Bayesian Information Criterion does not detect significant variability in any of the light curves. Thus, given the detection limitations due to the MOSFIRE sensitivity, we can only claim tentative low-level variability for 2M0050-3322 in the best-case scenario. The amplitudes of the peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for 2MASSJ00501994-332240 agree with the variability amplitude predictions of General Circulation Models for a T7.0 brown dwarf for an edge on object. Radiative-transfer models predict that the Na_2S and KCl clouds condense at pressures lower than that traced by the CH_4-H_2O band, which might explain the higher peak-to-peak fluctuations measured for this light curve. Finally, we provide a visual recreation of the map provided by General Circulation Models and the vertical structure of 2MASSJ00501994-332240 provided by radiative-transfer models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.