Paper detail

Tracing the outflow kinematics in Type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei

We have used the sample of 577 active galactic nuclei Type 1.8-2 spectra (z < 0.25), taken from Sloan Digital Sky Survey, to trace the influence of the outflow kinematics to the profiles of different emission lines (Hbeta, [O III], Halpha, [N II], [S II]). All considered lines were fitted with two Gaussian components: one which fits the core of the line, and another which fits the wings. We gave the procedure for decomposition of Halpha+[N II] wavelength band, for the spectra where these lines overlap. The influence of the gravitational/non-gravitational kinematics to the line components is investigated by comparing the dispersions of the line components with stellar velocity dispersion. We found that wing components of all considered emission lines have pure non-gravitational kinematics, the core components are consistent with gravitational kinematics for the Halpha, [N II] and [S II] lines, while in the [O III] there is evidence for contribution from non-gravitational kinematics. We adopted the wing components as proxy of the outflow contribution and we investigated the outflow kinematics by analysing the correlations between widths and between shifts of the wing components of different lines. We found the strong correlations between shifts and between wing component widths of all considered lines, with exception of the Hbeta wing component width. These correlations indicate that outflow dynamics systemically affects all emission lines in spectrum. However, it reflects with different strength in their profiles, which is observed as different widths of the wing components. The strongest outflow signature is observed in the [O III] lines, which have the broadest wing components, weaker in Halpha and [N II], and the weakest in [S II]. These results imply that considered lines arise in different parts of an outflowing region.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.