Paper detail

Tracing the molecular gas in distant submillimetre galaxies via CO(1-0) imaging with the EVLA

We report the results of a pilot study with the EVLA of 12CO J=1-0 emission from four SMGs at z=2.2-2.5, each with an existing detection of CO J=3-2. Using the EVLA's most compact configuration we detect strong, broad J=1-0 line emission from all of our targets. The median line width ratio, sigma(1-0)/sigma(3-2) = 1.15 +/- 0.06, suggests that the J=1-0 is more spatially extended than the J=3-2 emission, a situation confirmed by our maps which reveal velocity structure in several cases and typical sizes of ~16 kpc FWHM. The median Tb ratio is r(3-2/1-0) = 0.55 +/- 0.05, noting that our value may be biased high because of the J=3-2-based sample selection. Naively, this suggests gas masses ~2x higher than estimates made using higher-J transitions of CO, with the discrepency due to the difference in assumed Tb ratio. We also estimate masses using the 12CO J=1-0 line and the observed global Tb ratios, assuming standard underlying Tb ratios as well as a limiting SFE, i.e. without calling upon X(CO). Using this new method, we find a median molecular gas mass of (2.5 +/- 0.8) x 10^10 Msun, with a plausible range stretching 3x higher. Even larger masses cannot be ruled out, but are not favoured by dynamical constraints: the median dynamical mass for our sample is (2.3 +/- 1.4) x 10^11 Msun. We examine the Schmidt-Kennicutt relation for all the distant galaxy populations for which CO J=1-0 or J=2-1 data are available, finding small systematic differences. These have previously been interpreted as evidence for different modes of star formation, but we argue that these differences are to be expected, given the still considerable uncertainties. Finally, we discuss the morass of degeneracies surrounding molecular gas mass estimates, the possibilities for breaking them, and the future prospects for imaging and studying cold, quiescent molecular gas at high redshifts [abridged].

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.