Paper detail

Tracing the evolution of NGC6397 through the chemical composition of its stellar populations

With the aim to constrain multiple populations in the metal-poor globular cluster NGC6397, we analyse and discuss the chemical compositions of a large number of elements in 21 red giant branch stars. High-resolution spectra were obtained with the FLAMES/UVES spectrograph on VLT. We have determined non-LTE abundances of Na and LTE abundances for the remaining 21 elements, including O, Mg, Al, alpha, iron-peak, and neutron-capture elements, many of which have not previously been analysed for this cluster. We have also considered the influence of possible He enrichment in the analysis of stellar spectra. We find that the Na abundances of evolved, as well as unevolved, stars show a distinct bimodality, which suggests the presence of two stellar populations; one primordial stellar generation with composition similar to field stars, and a second generation that is enriched in material processed through hydrogen-burning (enriched in Na and Al and depleted in O and Mg). The cluster is dominated (75%) by the second generation. The red giant branch show a similar bimodal distribution in the Stroemgren colour index c_y=c_1-(b-y), implying a large difference also in N abundance. The two populations have the same composition of all analysed elements heavier than Al, within the measurement uncertainty of the analysis, with the possible exception of [Y/Fe]. Using two stars with close to identical stellar parameters, one from each generation, we estimate the difference in He content, Delta Y=0.01+-0.06, given the assumption that the mass fraction of iron is the same for the stars. Finally, we show that winds from fast rotating massive stars of the first generation can be held responsible for the abundance patterns observed in NGC6397 second generation long-lived stars and estimate that the initial mass of the cluster were at least ten times higher than its present-day value.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.