Paper detail

Tracing a decade of activity towards a yellow hypergiant. The spectral and spatial morphology of IRC+10420 at au scales

The fate of a massive star during the latest stages of its evolution is highly dependent on its mass-loss history and geometry, with the yellow hypergiants being key objects to study those phases of evolution. We present near-IR interferometric observations of the famous yellow hypergiant IRC +10420 and blue spectra taken between 1994-2019. Our 2.2 $μ$m GRAVITY/VLTI observations attain a spatial resolution of $\sim$5 stellar radii and probe the hot emission in the K-band tracing the gas via Na i double emission and the Br$γ$ emission. The observed configurations spatially resolve the 2.2 $μ$m continuum as well as the Br$γ$ and the Na i emission lines. Our geometric modelling demonstrates the presence of a compact neutral zone (Na i) which is slightly larger than the continuum but within an extended Br$γ$ emitting region. Our geometric models of the Br$γ$ emission confirm an hour-glass geometry of the wind. To explain this peculiar geometry we investigate the presence of a companion at 7-800 au separations and find no signature at the contrast limit of our observations (3.7 mag at 3$σ$). We report an evolution of the ejecta over a time span of 7 years, which allows us to constrain the opening angle of the hour-glass geometry at $<$10$^\circ$. Lastly, we present the first blue optical spectra of IRC +10420 since 1994. The multi-epoch data indicate that the spectral type, and thus temperature, of the object has essentially remained constant during the intervening years. This confirms earlier conclusions that following an increase in temperature of 2000 K in less than two decades prior to 1994, the temperature increase has halted. This suggests that this yellow hypergiant has "hit" the White Wall in the HR-diagram preventing it from evolving blue-wards, and will likely undergo a major mass-loss event in the near future.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.