Paper detail

Tracer-Field Cross-Correlations with $k$-Nearest Neighbor Distributions

In astronomy and cosmology, significant effort is devoted to characterizing and understanding spatial cross-correlations between points - e.g. galaxy positions, high energy neutrino arrival directions, X-ray and AGN sources, and continuous field - e.g. weak lensing and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) maps. Recently, we introduced the $k$-nearest neighbor formalism to better characterize the clustering of discrete (point) datasets. Here we extend it to the point-field cross-correlation analysis. It combines $k$NN measurements of the point data set with measurements of the field smoothed on many scales. The resulting statistics are sensitive to all orders in the joint clustering of the points and the field. We demonstrate that this approach, unlike the 2-pt cross-correlation, can measure the statistical dependence of two datasets even when there are no linear (Gaussian) correlations. We further demonstrate that this framework is far more effective than the two-point function in detecting cross-correlations when the continuous field is contaminated by high levels of noise. For a particularly high level of noise, the cross-correlations between halos and the underlying matter field in a cosmological simulation, between $10h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ and $30h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, is detected at $>5σ$ significance using the technique presented here, when the two-point cross-correlation significance is $\sim 1σ$. Finally, we show that the $k$NN cross-correlations of halos and the matter field can be well-modeled on quasilinear scales by the Hybrid Effective Field Theory (HEFT) framework, with the same set of bias parameters as are used for the two-point cross-correlations. The substantial improvement in the statistical power of detecting cross-correlations with this method makes it a promising tool for various cosmological applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.