Paper detail

Trace Repair Never Loses to Classical Repair: Exact and Explicit Helper Nodes Selection

Repairing Reed-Solomon codes with low bandwidth is a central challenge in distributed storage. Following the trace-repair framework of Guruswami and Wootters (2017), recent works by Lin (2023) and Liu-Wan-Xing (2024) provided significant improvements in bandwidth using two distinct ideas. Lin constructed a trace-repair scheme that requires no contribution from a set of predetermined nodes $\mathscr{S}$, while Liu-Wan-Xing identified linear dependencies among the downloaded traces, relating the number of dependent traces to the dimension of a subspace $\mathscr{W}_k$. In this work, we fully utilize and unify these ideas. We compute the exact dimension of $\mathscr{W}_{k,\mathscr{S}}$ (a generalization of $\mathscr{W}_k$). We identify the trade-off between the set size $|\mathscr{S}|$ and the dimension $\dim(\mathscr{W}_{k,\mathscr{S}})$. We provide an algorithm to find the combination that results in the lowest bandwidth. Furthermore, we provide an explicit choice of the helper nodes for the repair. Finally, we prove that our optimized scheme never loses to the classical repair scheme, establishing a bandwidth guarantee of at most $k\log|\mathbb{F}|$ bits for all dimension $k$ and field $\mathbb{F}$, whenever the trace repair is applicable.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.