Paper detail

Towards Utility-driven Anonymization of Transactions

Publishing person-specific transactions in an anonymous form is increasingly required by organizations. Recent approaches ensure that potentially identifying information (e.g., a set of diagnosis codes) cannot be used to link published transactions to persons' identities, but all are limited in application because they incorporate coarse privacy requirements (e.g., protecting a certain set of m diagnosis codes requires protecting all m-sized sets), do not integrate utility requirements, and tend to explore a small portion of the solution space. In this paper, we propose a more general framework for anonymizing transactional data under specific privacy and utility requirements. We model such requirements as constraints, investigate how these constraints can be specified, and propose COAT (COnstraint-based Anonymization of Transactions), an algorithm that anonymizes transactions using a flexible hierarchy-free generalization scheme to meet the specified constraints. Experiments with benchmark datasets verify that COAT significantly outperforms the current state-of-the-art algorithm in terms of data utility, while being comparable in terms of efficiency. The effectiveness of our approach is also demonstrated in a real-world scenario, which requires disseminating a private, patient-specific transactional dataset in a way that preserves both privacy and utility in intended studies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.