Paper detail

Towards understanding network topology and robustness of logistics systems

Advanced integration of logistics systems has been promoted for the sake of competitiveness and sustainability. Such efforts will enable more globally optimal and flexible operations by efficiently utilizing transportation capacity. At the same time, interconnection of transport operations increases complexity at a network level, which reduces the predictability of the response of the system to disruptions. However, our understanding of the behavior of such systems is still limited. In particular, the topology of the network, which changes as the systems are integrated, is an important factor that affects the performance of the entire system. Knowledge of such mechanisms would be useful in the design and evaluation of integrated logistics. Here, we developed a simple mathematical model that extracts the essence of the problem and performed extensive numerical experiments by Monte Carlo simulations for three scenarios that mimic changes in demand: (i) locally and temporally increased traffic demand, (ii) globally and temporally increased traffic demand, and (iii) permanent change in demand pattern, under various conditions on the type of route-finding algorithm, network structure, and transportation capacity. Adaptive route-finding algorithms were more effective in square lattice and random networks, which contained many bypass routes, than in hub-and-spoke networks. Furthermore, the square lattice and random networks were robust to the change in the demand pattern and temporal blockage of delivery paths (e.g., due to high demand). We suggest that such preferable properties are only present in networks with redundancy and that the bypass structure is an important criterion for designing network logistics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.