Paper detail

Towards Train-Test Consistency for Semi-supervised Temporal Action Localization

Recently, Weakly-supervised Temporal Action Localization (WTAL) has been densely studied but there is still a large gap between weakly-supervised models and fully-supervised models. It is practical and intuitive to annotate temporal boundaries of a few examples and utilize them to help WTAL models better detect actions. However, the train-test discrepancy of action localization strategy prevents WTAL models from leveraging semi-supervision for further improvement. At training time, attention or multiple instance learning is used to aggregate predictions of each snippet for video-level classification; at test time, they first obtain action score sequences over time, then truncate segments of scores higher than a fixed threshold, and post-process action segments. The inconsistent strategy makes it hard to explicitly supervise the action localization model with temporal boundary annotations at training time. In this paper, we propose a Train-Test Consistent framework, TTC-Loc. In both training and testing time, our TTC-Loc localizes actions by comparing scores of action classes and predicted threshold, which enables it to be trained with semi-supervision. By fixing the train-test discrepancy, our TTC-Loc significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art performance on THUMOS'14, ActivityNet 1.2 and 1.3 when only video-level labels are provided for training. With full annotations of only one video per class and video-level labels for the other videos, our TTC-Loc further boosts the performance and achieves 33.4\% mAP (IoU threshold 0.5) on THUMOS's 14.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.