Paper detail

Towards Top-Down Just Noticeable Difference Estimation of Natural Images

Just noticeable difference (JND) of natural images refers to the maximum pixel intensity change magnitude that typical human visual system (HVS) cannot perceive. Existing efforts on JND estimation mainly dedicate to modeling the diverse masking effects in either/both spatial or/and frequency domains, and then fusing them into an overall JND estimate. In this work, we turn to a dramatically different way to address this problem with a top-down design philosophy. Instead of explicitly formulating and fusing different masking effects in a bottom-up way, the proposed JND estimation model dedicates to first predicting a critical perceptual lossless (CPL) counterpart of the original image and then calculating the difference map between the original image and the predicted CPL image as the JND map. We conduct subjective experiments to determine the critical points of 500 images and find that the distribution of cumulative normalized KLT coefficient energy values over all 500 images at these critical points can be well characterized by a Weibull distribution. Given a testing image, its corresponding critical point is determined by a simple weighted average scheme where the weights are determined by a fitted Weibull distribution function. The performance of the proposed JND model is evaluated explicitly with direct JND prediction and implicitly with two applications including JND-guided noise injection and JND-guided image compression. Experimental results have demonstrated that our proposed JND model can achieve better performance than several latest JND models. In addition, we also compare the proposed JND model with existing visual difference predicator (VDP) metrics in terms of the capability in distortion detection and discrimination. The results indicate that our JND model also has a good performance in this task.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.