Paper detail

Towards the true number of flaring giant stars in the Kepler field. Are there flaring specialities associated with the giant nature?

We aim to give a reliable estimate of the number of flaring giant stars in the Kepler field. By analyzing the flaring activity of these stars we explore their flare statistics and the released flare energies. The role of oscillation in suppressing magnetic activity is also investigated. On a sample of flaring giant stars we search for flaring specialities which may be associated with the giant nature. We search for flares using the full K1 data on a sample of 706 stars compiled from two lists of flaring giants found in the literature. In the end, we confirm only 61 stars as flaring giants. Among these 61 flaring giants we found only six which also show oscillations; we suggest that a large fraction of the 61 flaring giants are members of spectroscopic binaries which are proven already for 11. Tests are carried out to correct the detection bias at low flare energies for a subsample of 19 further studied, frequently flaring stars. For these 19 stars flare energy distributions and flare frequency diagrams (FFDs) are constructed. The number of detected flares on giant stars correlate only weakly with the rotational periods. The 61 confirmed flaring giant stars make up only about 0.3% of the entire giant star population in the Kepler database, in contrast with previous estimates of about an order higher percentage. No strong correlation was found between the stellar properties and the flaring characteristics. The wide scale of the flaring specialities are hardly related to the giant nature, if at all. This, together with the finding that the observed flare durations correlate with flare energies, regardless of the flare energy level and stellar luminosity class, suggest common background physics in flaring stars, or in other words, a general scaling effect behind.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.