Paper detail

Towards the optimization of ballistics in proton therapy using genetic algorithms: implementation issues

The dose delivered to the planning target volume by proton beams is highly conformal, sparing organs at risk and normal tissues. New treatment planning systems adapted to spot scanning techniques have been recently proposed to simultaneously optimize several fields and thus improve dose delivery. In this paper, we investigate a new optimization framework based on a genetic algorithm approach. This tool is intended to make it possible to explore new schemes of treatment delivery, possibly with future enhanced technologies. The optimization framework is designed to be versatile and to account for many degrees of freedom, without any {\it a priori} technological constraint. To test the behavior of our algorithm, we propose in this paper, as an example, to optimize beam fluences, target points and irradiation directions at the same time. The proposed optimization routine takes typically into account several thousands of spots of fixed size. The evolution is carried out by the three standard genetic operators: mutation, crossover and selection. The figure-of-merit (or fitness) is based on an objective function relative to the dose prescription to the tumor and to the limits set for organs at risk and normal tissues. Fluence optimization is carried out via a specific scheme based on a plain gradient with analytical solution. Several specific genetic algorithm issues are addressed: (i) the mutation rate is tuned to balance the search and selection forces, (ii) the initial population is selected using a bootstrap technique and (iii) to scale down the computation time, dose calculations are carried out with a fast analytical ray tracing method and are multi-threaded. In this paper implementation issues of the optimization framework are thoroughly described. The behavior of the proposed genetic algorithm is illustrated in both elementary and clinically-realistic test cases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.