Paper detail

Towards the Chalonge Meudon Workshop 2013. Highlights and Conclusions of the Chalonge Meudon workshop 2012: warm dark matter galaxy formation in agreement with observations

Warm Dark Matter(WDM), considerably clarifies and simplifies galaxies and galaxy formation in agreement with observations. WDM essentially works, naturally reproducing the astronomical observations over all scales, small (galactic) as well as large and cosmological scales.Evidence that CDM, CDM+baryons and proposed tailored cures do not work in galaxies is staggering, The Chalonge Meudon Workshop 2012 approached DM in a fourfold coherent way: astronomical observations (galaxy and cluster properties, haloes, rotation curves, density profiles, surface density), LambdaWDM N-body simulations, WDM theory (Boltzmann-Vlasov evolution, halo mass functions, halo models, improved perturbative approachs), quantum WDM fermions forming the observed cores, WDM particle and nuclear physics (sterile neutrinos) and its experimental search. N Amorisco, P Biermann, S Das, H J de Vega, A Kamada, E Ferri(MARE),I D Karanchetsev, W Liao, M Lovell, M Papastergis, N G Sanchez, P Valageas,C Watson, J Zavala,He Zhang present their Highlights.Inside galaxy cores, N-body classical physics simulations are incorrect for WDM because of important quantum effects at such scales.Quantum WDM calculations (Thomas-Fermi) provide galaxy cores, galaxy masses, velocity dispersions and density profiles in agreement with observations.Baryons (16% of DM) are expected to give a correction to pure WDM results. The summary and conclusions by H. J. de Vega and N. G. Sanchez stress that all evidences point to a DM particle mass around 2 keV. Peter Biermann in his live minutes concludes that a few keV sterile neutrino is the most serious DM candidate. MARE -and hopefully KATRIN- could provide a sterile neutrino signal.There is a formidable WDM work to perform ahead of us, these highlights point research directions worthwhile to pursue.Photos of the Workshop are included (Abridged).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.