Paper detail

Towards Resolving the Crab $σ-$Problem: A Linear Accelerator?

Using the exact solution of the axisymmetric pulsar magnetosphere derived in a previous publication and the conservation laws of the associated MHD flow, we show that the Lorentz factor of the outflowing plasma increases linearly with distance from the light cylinder. Therefore, the ratio of the Poynting to particle energy flux, generically referred to as $σ$, decreases inversely proportional to distance, from a large value (typically $\gsim 10^4$)near the light cylinder to $\s \simeq 1$ at a transistion distance $R_{\rm trans}$. Beyond this distance the inertial effects of the outflowing plasma become important and the magnetic field geometry must deviate from the almost monopolar form it attains between $R_{lc}$ and $R_{\rm trans}$. We anticipate that this is achieved by collimation of the poloidal field lines toward the rotation axis, ensuring that the magnetic field pressure in the equatorial region will fall-off faster than $1/R^2$ ($R$ being the cylindrical radius). This leads both to a value $\s=ß\ll 1$ at the nebular reverse shock at distance $R_s$ ($R_s \gg R_{\rm trans}$) and to a component of the flow perpendicular to the equatorial component, as required by observation. The presence of the strong shock at $R = R_s$ allows for the efficient conversion of kinetic energy into radiation. We speculate that the Crab pulsar is unique in requiring $ß\simeq 3 \times 10^{-3}$ because of its small translational velocity, which allowed for the shock distance $R_s$ to grow to values $\gg R_{\rm trans}$.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.