Paper detail

Towards rational design of carbon nitride photocatalysts: Identification of cyanamide "defects" as catalytically relevant sites

The heptazine-based polymer melon (also known as graphitic carbon nitride, g-C3N4), is a promising photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Nonetheless, attempts to improve its inherently low activity are rarely based on rational approaches due to a lack of fundamental understanding of its mechanistic operation. Here, we employ molecular heptazine-based model catalysts to identify the cyanamide moiety as a photocatalytically relevant "defect". We exploit this knowledge for the rational design of a carbon nitride polymer populated with cyanamide groups, yielding a material with 12- and 16-times the hydrogen evolution rate and apparent quantum efficiency (400 nm), respectively, compared to the benchmark melon. Computational modelling and material characterization suggest this moiety improves co-ordination (and, in turn, charge transfer kinetics) to the platinum co-catalyst and enhances the separation of the photo-generated charge carriers. The demonstrated knowledge transfer for rational catalyst design presented here provides the conceptual framework for engineering high performance heptazine-based photocatalysts.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.