Paper detail

Towards Quantized Number Theory: Spectral Operators and an Asymmetric Criterion for the Riemann Hypothesis

This research expository article contains a survey of earlier work (in \S2--\S4) but also contains a main new result (in \S5), which we first describe. Given $c \geq 0$, the spectral operator $\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{a}_c$ can be thought of intuitively as the operator which sends the geometry onto the spectrum of a fractal string of dimension not exceeding $c$. Rigorously, it turns out to coincide with a suitable quantization of the Riemann zeta function $ζ= ζ(s)$: $\mathfrak{a} = ζ(\partial)$, where $\partial = \partial_c$ is the infinitesimal shift of the real line acting on the weighted Hilbert space $L^2 (\mathbb{R}, e^{-2ct} dt)$. In this paper, we establish a new asymmetric criterion for the Riemann hypothesis, expressed in terms of the invertibility of the spectral operator for all values of the dimension parameter $c \in (0, 1/2)$ (i.e., for all $c$ in the left half of the critical interval $(0,1)$). This corresponds (conditionally) to a mathematical (and perhaps also, physical) "phase transition" occurring in the midfractal case when $c= 1/2$. Both the universality and the non-universality of $ζ= ζ(s)$ in the right (resp., left) critical strip $\{1/2 < \text{Re}(s) < 1 \}$ (resp., $\{0 < \text{Re}(s) < 1/2 \}$) play a key role in this context. These new results are presented in \S5. In \S2, we briefly discuss earlier joint work on the complex dimensions of fractal strings, while in \S3 and \S4, we survey earlier related work of the author with H. Maier and with H. Herichi, respectively, in which were established symmetric criteria for the Riemann hypothesis, expressed respectively in terms of a family of natural inverse spectral problems for fractal strings of Minkowski dimension $D \in (0,1),$ with $D \neq 1/2$, and of the quasi-invertibility of the family of spectral operators $\mathfrak{a}_c$ (with $c \in (0,1), c \neq 1/2$).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.