Paper detail

Towards PTAS for Precedence Constrained Scheduling via Combinatorial Algorithms

We study the classic problem of scheduling $n$ precedence constrained unit-size jobs on $m = O(1)$ machines so as to minimize the makespan. In a recent breakthrough, Levey and Rothvoss \cite{LR16} developed a $(1+ε)$-approximation for the problem with running time $\exp\Big(\exp\Big(O\big(\frac{m^2}{ε^2}\log^2\log n\big)\Big)\Big)$, via the Sherali-Adams lift of the basic linear programming relaxation for the problem by $\exp\Big(O\big(\frac{m^2}{ε^2}\log^2\log n\big)\Big)$ levels. Garg \cite{Garg18} recently improved the number of levels to $\log ^{O(m^2/ε^2)}n$, and thus the running time to $\exp\big(\log ^{O(m^2/ε^2)}n\big)$, which is quasi-polynomial for constant $m$ and $ε$. In this paper we present an algorithm that achieves $(1+ε)$-approximation for the problem with running time $n^{O\left(\frac{m^4}{ε^3}\log^3\log n\right)}$, which is very close to a polynomial for constant $m$ and $ε$. Unlike the algorithms of Levey-Rothvoss and Garg, which are based on linear-programming hierarchy, our algorithm is purely combinatorial. For this problem, we show that the conditioning operations on the lifted LP solution can be replaced by making guesses about the optimum schedule.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.