Paper detail

Towards personalized computer simulations of breast cancer treatment

Cancer pathology is unique to a given individual, and developing personalized diagnostic and treatment protocols are a primary concern. Mathematical modeling and simulation is a promising approach to personalized cancer medicine. Yet, the complexity, heterogeneity and multiscale nature of cancer present severe challenges. One of the major barriers to use mathematical models to predict the outcome of therapeutic regimens in a particular patient lies in their initialization and parameterization in order to reflect individual cancer characteristics accurately. Here we present a study where we used multitype measurements acquired routinely on a single breast tumor, including histopathology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and molecular profiling, to personalize a multiscale hybrid cellular automaton model of breast cancer treated with chemotherapeutic and antiangiogenic agents. We model drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at the tumor tissue level but with cellular and subcellular resolution. We simulate those spatio-temporal dynamics in 2D cross-sections of tumor portions over 12-week therapy regimes, resulting in complex and computationally intensive simulations. For such computationally demanding systems, formal statistical inference methods to estimate individual parameters from data have not been feasible in practice to until most recently, after the emergence of machine learning techniques applied to likelihood-free inference methods. Here we use the inference advances provided by Bayesian optimization to fit our model to simulated data of individual patients. In this way, we investigate if some key parameters can be estimated from a series of measurements of cell density in the tumor tissue, as well as how often the measurements need to be taken to allow reliable predictions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.