Paper detail

Towards optimal regularity for the fourth-order thin film equation in $\re^N$: Graveleau-type focusing self-similarity

An approach to some "optimal" (more precisely, non-improvable) regularity of solutions of the thin film equation u_{t} = -\nabla \cdot(|u|^{n} \nabla \D u) in \ren \times \re_+, u(x,0)=u_0(x) in \re^N, where n in (0,2) is a fixed exponent, with smooth compactly supported initial data u_0(x), in dimensions $N \geq 2$ is discussed. Namely, a precise exponent for the Hölder continuity with respect to the spatial radial variable $|x|$ is obtained by construction of a Graveleau-type focusing self-similar solution. As a consequence, optimal regularity of the gradient $\nabla u$ in certain $L^p$ spaces, as well as a Hölder continuity property of solutions with respect to x and t, are derived, which cannot be obtained by classic standard methods of integral identities-inequalities. Several profiles for the solutions in the cases n=0 and n>0 are also plotted. In general, we claim that, even for arbitrarily small n>0 and positive analytic initial data u_0(x), the solutions u(x,t) cannot be better than $C_x^{2-\e}$-smooth, where $\e(n)=O(n)$ as $n \to 0$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.