Paper detail

Towards One Tonne Direct WIMP Detectors: Have we got what it takes?

Experimentally have we got what it takes to pursue the direct observation of WIMP interactions down to sensitivities of a few events /100 kg/year? For a Ge target with a low energy threshold (<20 keVr) this corresponds to a WIMP-nucleon sigma~10^-46 cm^2. A number of recent theoretical papers, making calculations in SUSY-based frameworks, show many (>5) orders of magnitude spread in the possible interaction rates for models consistent with existing Cosmology and Accelerator bounds. Some theorists, but certainly not all, are able to generate models, that lead to interaction rates at the few /kg/day that would be implied by the current DAMA annual modulation signal. All theorists demonstrate models that generate much lower interaction rates. This paper takes an unashamed experimentalist`s view of the issues that arise when looking forward to constructing 1 tonne WIMP detectors.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.