Paper detail

Towards non-independence of modular additions in searching differential trails of ARX ciphers: new automatic methods with application to SPECK and Chaskey

ARX-based ciphers, constructed by the modular addition, rotation and XOR operations, have been receiving a lot of attention in the design of lightweight symmetric ciphers. For their differential cryptanalysis, most automatic search methods of differential trails adopt the assumption of independence of modulo additions. However, this assumption does not necessarily hold when the trail includes consecutive modular additions (CMAs). It has already been found that in this case some differential trails searched by automatic methods before are actually impossible, but the study is not in depth yet, for example, few effort has been paid to exploiting the root causes of non-independence between CMAs and accurate calculation of probabilities of the valid trails. In this paper, we devote to solving these two problems. By examing the differential equations of single and consecutive modular additions, we find that the influence of non-independence can be described by relationships between constraints on the intermediate state of two additions. Specifically, constraints of the first addition can make some of its output bits non-uniform, and when they meet the constraints of the second addition, the differential probability of the whole CMA may be different from the value calculated under the independence assumption. As a result, we can build SAT models to verify the validity of a given differential trail of ARX ciphers and #SAT models to calculate the exact probabilities of the differential propagation through CMAs in the trail, promising a more accurate evaluation of probability of the trail. Our automic methods and searching tools are applied to search related-key differential trails of SPECK and Chaskey including CMAs in the key schedule and the round function respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.