Paper detail

Towards Network-Failure-Tolerant Content Delivery for Web Content

Popularly used to distribute a variety of multimedia content items in today Internet, HTTP-based web content delivery still suffers from various content delivery failures. Hindered by the expensive deployment cost, the conventional CDN can not deploy as many edge servers as possible to successfully deliver content items to all users under these delivery failures. In this paper, we propose a joint CDN and peer-assisted web content delivery framework to address the delivery failure problem. Different from conventional peer-assisted approaches for web content delivery, which mainly focus on alleviating the CDN servers bandwidth load, we study how to use a browser-based peer-assisted scheme, namely WebRTC, to resolve content delivery failures. To this end, we carry out large-scale measurement studies on how users access and view webpages. Our measurement results demonstrate the challenges (e.g., peers stay on a webpage extremely short) that can not be directly solved by conventional P2P strategies, and some important webpage viewing patterns. Due to these unique characteristics, WebRTC peers open up new possibilities for helping the web content delivery, coming with the problem of how to utilize the dynamic resources efficiently. We formulate the peer selection that is the critical strategy in our framework, as an optimization problem, and design a heuristic algorithm based on the measurement insights to solve it. Our simulation experiments driven by the traces from Tencent QZone demonstrate the effectiveness of our design: compared with non-peer-assisted strategy and random peer selection strategy, our design significantly improves the successful relay ratio of web content items under network failures, e.g., our design improves the content download ratio up to 60% even when users located in a particular region (e.g., city) where none can connect to the regional CDN server.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.