Paper detail

Towards Interpretable AI in Personalized Medicine: A Radiological-Biological Radiomics Dictionary Connecting Semantic Lung-RADS and imaging Radiomics Features; Dictionary LC 1.0

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with survival strongly dependent on early detection. Standard-dose computed tomography (CT) screening using the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) standardizes pulmonary nodule assessment but is limited by inter-reader variability and reliance on qualitative descriptors, while radiomics offers quantitative biomarkers that often lack clinical interpretability. To bridge this gap, we propose a radiological-biological dictionary that aligns radiomic features (RFs) with Lung-RADS semantic categories. A clinically informed dictionary translating ten Lung-RADS descriptors into radiomic proxies was developed through literature curation and validated by eight expert reviewers. As a proof of concept, imaging and clinical data from 977 patients across 12 collections in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) were analyzed; following preprocessing and manual segmentation, 110 RFs per nodule were extracted using PyRadiomics in compliance with the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI). A semi-supervised learning framework incorporating 499 labeled and 478 unlabeled cases was applied to improve generalizability, evaluating seven feature selection methods and ten interpretable classifiers. The optimal pipeline (ANOVA feature selection with a support vector machine) achieved a mean validation accuracy of 0.79. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified key RFs corresponding to Lung-RADS semantics such as attenuation, margin irregularity, and spiculation, supporting the validity of the proposed mapping. Overall, this dictionary provides an interpretable framework linking radiomics and Lung-RADS semantics, advancing explainable artificial intelligence for CT-based lung cancer screening.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.