Paper detail

Towards inference of overlapping gravitational wave signals

Merger rates of binary black holes, binary neutron stars, and neutron star-black hole binaries in the local Universe (i.e., redshift $z=0$), inferred from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo, are $16-130\, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, $13-1900\, \mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, and $7.4-320\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, respectively. These rates suggest that there is a significant chance that two or more of these signals will overlap with each other during their lifetime in the sensitivity-band of future gravitational-wave detectors such as the Cosmic Explorer and Einstein Telescope. The detection pipelines provide the coalescence time of each signal with an accuracy $\mathcal{O}(10\,\rm ms)$. We show that using a prior on the coalescence time from a detection pipeline, it is possible to correctly infer the properties of these overlapping signals with the current data-analysis infrastructure. We study different configurations of two overlapping signals created by non-spinning binaries, varying their time and phase at coalescence, as well as their signal-to-noise ratios. We conclude that, for the scenarios considered in this work, parameter inference is robust provided that their coalescence times in the detector frame are more than $\sim 1-2 \,\mathrm{s}$. Signals whose coalescence epochs lie within $\sim 0.5\,\mathrm{s}$ of each other suffer from significant biases in parameter inference, and new strategies and algorithms would be required to overcome such biases.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.