Paper detail

Towards Hodge Theoretic Characterizations of 2d Rational SCFTs

The study of rational conformal field theories in the moduli space is of particular interest since these theories correspond to points in moduli space where the algebraic and arithmetic structure are usually richer, while also being points where non--trivial physics occurs (such as in the study of attractor black holes and BPS states at rational points). This has led to various attempts to characterize and classify such rational points. In this paper, a conjectured characterization by Gukov--Vafa of rational conformal field theories whose target space is a Ricci flat Kähler manifold is analyzed carefully for the case of toroidal compactifications. We refine the conjectured statement as well as making an effort to verify it, using $T^4$ compactification as a test case. Seven common properties in terms of Hodge theory (including complex multiplication) have been identified for $T^4$-target rational conformal field theories. By imposing three properties out of the seven, however, there remain $\mathcal N = (1,1)$ SCFTs that are not rational. Open questions, implications and future lines of work are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.