Paper detail

Towards excluding a light $Z^\prime$ explanation of $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$

The discrepancies between $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ data and the corresponding Standard Model predictions constitute the most significant hints for new physics (at the TeV scale or below) currently available. In fact, many scenarios that can account for these anomalies have been proposed in the literature. However, only a single light new physics explanation, i.e. with a mass below the $B$ meson scale, is possible: a light $Z^\prime$ boson. In this article, we point out that improved limits on $B\to K^{(*)}νν$, including the experimental sensitivities required for a proper treatment of the necessarily sizable $Z^\prime$ width, together with the forthcoming Belle~II analyses of $e^+e^-\toμ^+μ^-+{\rm invisible}$, can rule out a $Z^\prime$ explanation of $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ data with a mass below $\approx4\,$GeV. Importantly, such a light $Z^\prime$ is the only viable single particle solution to the $b\to s\ell^+\ell^-$ anomalies predicting $R(K^{(*)})>0$ in high $q^2$ bins, therefore providing an essential consistency test of data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.