Paper detail

Towards ending the partial sky E-B ambiguity in CMB observations

A crucial problem for partial sky analysis of CMB polarization is the $E$-$B$ leakage problem. Such leakage arises from the presence of `ambiguous' modes that satisfy properties of both $E$ and $B$ modes. Solving this problem is critical for primordial polarization $B$ mode detection in partial sky CMB polarization experiments. In this work we introduce a new method for reducing the leakage. We demonstrate that if we complement the $E$-mode information outside the observation patch with ancillary data from full-sky CMB observations, we can reduce and even effectively remove the $E$-to-$B$ leakage. For this objective, we produce $E$-mode Stokes $QU$ maps from Wiener filtered full-sky intensity and polarization CMB observations. We use these maps to fill the sky region that is not observed by the ground-based experiment of interest, and thus complement the partial sky Stokes $QU$ maps. Since the $E$-mode information is now available on the full sky we see a significant reduction in the $E$-to-$B$ leakage. We evaluate on simulated data sets the performance of our method for a `shallow' $f_\text{sky}=8\%$, and a `deep' $f_\text{sky}=2\%$ northern hemisphere sky patch, with AliCPT-like properties, and a LSPE-like $f_\text{sky}=30\%$ sky patch, by combining those observations with Planck-like full sky polarization maps. We find that our method outperforms the standard and the pure-$B$ method pseudo-$C_\ell$ estimators for all of our simulations. Our new method gives unbiased estimates of the $B$-mode power spectrum through-out the entire multipole range with near-optimal pseudo-$C_\ell$ errors for $\ell>20$. We also study the application of our method to the CMB-S4 experiment combined with LiteBIRD-like full sky data, and show that using signal-dominated full sky $E$-mode data we can eliminate the $E$-to-$B$ leakage problem.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.