Paper detail

Towards Confident Machine Reading Comprehension

There has been considerable progress on academic benchmarks for the Reading Comprehension (RC) task with State-of-the-Art models closing the gap with human performance on extractive question answering. Datasets such as SQuAD 2.0 & NQ have also introduced an auxiliary task requiring models to predict when a question has no answer in the text. However, in production settings, it is also necessary to provide confidence estimates for the performance of the underlying RC model at both answer extraction and "answerability" detection. We propose a novel post-prediction confidence estimation model, which we call Mr.C (short for Mr. Confident), that can be trained to improve a system's ability to refrain from making incorrect predictions with improvements of up to 4 points as measured by Area Under the Curve (AUC) scores. Mr.C can benefit from a novel white-box feature that leverages the underlying RC model's gradients. Performance prediction is particularly important in cases of domain shift (as measured by training RC models on SQUAD 2.0 and evaluating on NQ), where Mr.C not only improves AUC, but also traditional answerability prediction (as measured by a 5 point improvement in F1).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.