Paper detail

Towards atomistic resolution structure of phosphatidylcholine glycerol backbone and choline headgroup at different ambient conditions

Phospholipids are essential building blocks of biological membranes. Despite of vast amount of accurate experimental data the atomistic resolution structures sampled by the glycerol backbone and choline headgroup in phoshatidylcholine bilayers are not known. Atomistic resolution molecular dynamics simulation model would automatically resolve the structures giving an interpretation of experimental results, if the model would reproduce the experimental data. In this work we compare the C-H bond vector order parameters for glycerol backbone and choline headgroup between 14 different atomistic resolution models and experiments in fully hydrated lipid bilayer. The current models are not accurately enough to resolve the structure. However, closer inspection of three best performing models (CHARMM36, GAFFlipid and MacRog) suggest that improvements in the sampled dihedral angle distributions would potentilly lead to the model which would resolve the structure. Despite of the inaccuracy in the fully hydrated structures, the response to the dehydration, i.e. P-N vector tilting more parallel to membrane normal, is qualitatively correct in all models. The CHARMM36 and MacRog models describe the interactions between lipids and cholesterol better than Berger/Höltje model. This work has been, and continues to be, progressed and discussed through the blog: nmrlipids.blogspot.fi. Everyone is invited to join the discussion and make contributions through the blog. The manuscript will be eventually submitted to an appropriate scientific journal. Everyone who has contributed to the work through the blog will be offered coauthorship. For more details see: nmrlipids.blogspot.fi.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access15 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.