Paper detail

Towards Approximate Query Enumeration with Sublinear Preprocessing Time

This paper aims at providing extremely efficient algorithms for approximate query enumeration on sparse databases, that come with performance and accuracy guarantees. We introduce a new model for approximate query enumeration on classes of relational databases of bounded degree. We first prove that on databases of bounded degree any local first-order definable query can be enumerated approximately with constant delay after a constant time preprocessing phase. We extend this, showing that on databases of bounded tree-width and bounded degree, every query that is expressible in first-order logic can be enumerated approximately with constant delay after a sublinear (more precisely, polylogarithmic) time preprocessing phase. Durand and Grandjean (ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2007) proved that exact enumeration of first-order queries on databases of bounded degree can be done with constant delay after a linear time preprocessing phase. Hence we achieve a significant speed-up in the preprocessing phase. Since sublinear running time does not allow reading the whole input database even once, sacrificing some accuracy is inevitable for our speed-up. Nevertheless, our enumeration algorithms come with guarantees: With high probability, (1) only tuples are enumerated that are answers to the query or `close' to being answers to the query, and (2) if the proportion of tuples that are answers to the query is sufficiently large, then all answers will be enumerated. Here the notion of `closeness' is a tuple edit distance in the input database. For local first-order queries, only actual answers are enumerated, strengthening (1). Moreover, both the `closeness' and the proportion required in (2) are controllable. We combine methods from property testing of bounded degree graphs with logic and query enumeration, which we believe can inspire further research.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.