Paper detail

Towards a robust ad-hoc data correction approach that yields reliable atomic pair distribution functions from powder diffraction data

We examine the equations to obtain atomic pair distribution functions (PDFs) from x-ray, neutron and electron powder diffraction data with a view to obtaining reliable and accurate PDFs from the raw data using a largely \emph{ad hoc} correction process. We find that this should be possible under certain circumstances that hold, to a reasonably good approximation, in many modern experiments. We describe a variational approach that could be applied to find data correction parameters that is highly automatable and should require little in the way of user inputs yet results in quantitatively reliable PDFs, modulo unknown scale factors that are often not of scientific interest when profile fitting models are applied to the data with scale-factor as a parameter. We have worked on a particular implementation of these ideas and demonstrate that it yields PDFs that are of comparable quality to those obtained with existing x-ray data reduction program PDFgetX2. This opens the door to rapid and highly automated processing of raw data to obtain PDFs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.