Paper detail

Towards a q-analogue of the Harer-Zagier formula via rook placements

In 1986 Harer and Zagier computed a certain matrix integral to determine an influential closed-form formula for the number of (orientable) one-face maps on n vertices colored from N colors. Kerov (1997) provided a proof which computed the same matrix integral differently, which gave an interpretation of these numbers as also counting the number of placements of non-attacking rooks on Young diagrams. Bernardi (2010) provided a bijective proof of this formula by putting one-face maps in bijection with tree-rooted maps, which are orientable maps with a designated spanning tree. In the first part of the paper, we explore the connection between these rook placements and tree-rooted maps by developing a bijection between these objects. Rook placements on Young diagrams have a q-analogue due to Garsia and Remmel (1986). In the second part of the paper, we propose a statistic on rook placements that leads to a conjectured identity which is a q-analogue of part of the Harer-Zagier formula. This identity is also expressed in terms of moments of orthogonal polynomials which are rescaling of q-Hermite polynomials. We then use these moments to give a recurrence for the proposed q-analogue.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.