Paper detail

Towards a more rigorous treatment of uncertainties on the velocity distribution of dark matter particles for capture in stars

Dark matter (DM) capture in stars offers a rich phenomenology that makes it possible to probe a wide variety of particle DM scenarios in diverse astrophysical environments. In spite of decades of improvements to refine predictions of capture-related observables and better quantify astrophysical and particle-physics uncertainties, the actual impact of the Galactic phase-space distribution function of DM has been overlooked. In this work, we tackle this problem by making use of self-consistent equilibrium phase-space models based on the Eddington inversion formalism and an extension of this method to a DM halo with some degree of anisotropy in velocity space. We demonstrate that incorrectly accounting for the variation of the DM velocity distribution with position in the Galaxy leads to a systematic error between a factor two and two orders of magnitude, depending in particular on the target star, the DM candidate mass and the type of interaction involved. Moreover, we show that underlying phase-space properties, such as the anisotropy of the velocity tensor, actually play an important part -- previously disregarded -- and can have a sizable impact on predictions of capture rates and subsequent observables. We argue that Eddington-like methods, which self-consistently account for kinematic constraints on the components of the Galaxy, actually provide a reliable next-to-minimal approach to narrow down uncertainties from phase-space modeling on predictions of observables related to DM capture in stars.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.