Paper detail

Towards a general parametrization of the warm dark matter halo mass function

Studies of flux anomalies statistics and perturbations in stellar streams have the potential to constrain models of warm dark matter (WDM), including sterile neutrinos. Producing these constraints requires a parametrization of the WDM mass function relative to that of the cold dark matter (CDM) equivalent. We use five WDM models with half-mode masses, $M_\mathrm{hm}=[1.3,35]\times10^{8}$~$M_{\odot}$, spread across simulations of the Local Group, lensing ellipticals and the $z=2$ universe, to generate such a parametrization: we fit parameters to a functional form for the WDM-to-CDM halo mass function ratio, $n_\mathrm{WDM}(M_{X})/n_\mathrm{CDM}(M_{X})$, of ($1+(αM_\mathrm{hm}/M_{X})^β)^γ$. For $M_{X}\equiv$ virial mass of central halos we obtain $α=2.3$, $β=0.8$, and $γ=-1.0$, and this fit is steeper than the extended Press-Schechter formalism predicts. For $M_{X}\equiv$ mass of subhalos we instead obtain $α=4.2$, $β=2.5$ and $γ=-0.2$; in both mass definitions the scatter is $\sim20$~per~cent. The second fit typically underestimates the relative abundance of $z=2$ WDM subhaloes at the tens of per cent level. We caution that robust constraints will require bespoke simulations and a careful definition of halo mass, particularly for subhalos of mass $<10^{8}M_{\odot}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.