Paper detail

Towards a Data Reduction for the Minimum Flip Supertree Problem

In computational phylogenetics, the problem of constructing a supertree of a given set of rooted input trees can be formalized in different ways, to cope with contradictory information in the input. We consider the Minimum Flip Supertree problem, where the input trees are transformed into a 0/1/?-matrix, such that each row represents a taxon, and each column represents an inner node of one of the input trees. Our goal is to find a perfect phylogeny for the input matrix requiring a minimum number of 0/1-flips, that is, corrections of 0/1-entries in the matrix. The problem is known to be NP-complete. Here, we present a parameterized data reduction with polynomial running time. The data reduction guarantees that the reduced instance has a solution if and only if the original instance has a solution. We then make our data reduction parameter-independent by using upper bounds. This allows us to preprocess an instance, and to solve the reduced instance with an arbitrary method. Different from an existing data reduction for the consensus tree problem, our reduction allows us to draw conclusions about certain entries in the matrix. We have implemented and evaluated our data reduction. Unfortunately, we find that the Minimum Flip Supertree problem is also hard in practice: The amount of information that can be derived during data reduction diminishes as instances get more "complicated", and running times for "complicated" instances quickly become prohibitive. Still, our method offers another route of attack for this relevant phylogenetic problem.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.