Paper detail

Towards a Complete Census of AGNs in Nearby Galaxies: The Incidence of Growing Black Holes

We investigate the local supermassive black hole (SMBH) density function and relative mass accretion rates of all active galactic nuclei (AGNs) identified in a volume-limited sample of infrared (IR) bright galaxies (L_IR > 3 x 10^9 L_sun) to D<15 Mpc (Goulding & Alexander 2009). A database of accurate SMBH mass (M_BH) estimates is compiled from literature sources using physically motivated AGN modeling techniques (reverberation mapping, maser mapping and gas kinematics) and well-established indirect M_BH estimation methods (the M-sigma and M_BH-L_(K,bul) relations). For the three sources without previously published M_BH estimates, we use 2MASS K-band imaging and GALFIT to constrain the bulge luminosities, and hence SMBH masses. In general, we find the AGNs in the sample host SMBHs which are spread over a wide mass range (M_BH ~ (0.1-30) x 10^7 M_sun), but with the majority in the poorly studied M_BH ~ 10^6-10^7 M_sun region. Using sensitive hard X-ray (2-10 keV) and mid-IR constraints we calculate the bolometric luminosities of the AGNs (L_(Bol,AGN)) and use them to estimate relative mass accretion rates. We use these data to calculate the volume-average SMBH growth rate of galaxies in the local Universe and find that the AGNs hosting SMBHs in the mass range M_BH ~ 10^6-10^7 M_sun are dominated by optically unidentified AGNs. These relatively small SMBHs are acquiring a significant proportion of their mass in the present-day, and are amongst the most rapidly growing in the local Universe (SMBH mass doubling times of ~6 Gyrs). Additionally, we find tentative evidence for an increasing volume-weighted AGN fraction with decreasing SMBH mass in the M_BH ~ 10^6-10^8 M_sun range. Overall, we conclude that significant mass accretion onto small SMBHs may be missed in even the most sensitive optical surveys due to absent or weak optical AGN signatures.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.