Paper detail

Toward the low-scatter selection of X-ray clusters: Galaxy cluster detection with eROSITA through cluster outskirts

One key ingredient in using galaxy clusters (GCs) as a precision cosmological probe in large X-ray surveys is to understand selection effects. The dependence of the X-ray emission on the square of the gas density leads to a predominant role of cool cores in the detection of GCs. The contribution of cool cores to the X-ray luminosity does not scale with GC mass and cosmology and therefore affects the use of X-ray GCs in producing cosmological constraints. One of the main science goals of the eROSITA mission is to constrain cosmology with a wide X-ray survey. We propose an eROSITA GC detection scheme that avoids the use of X-ray GC centers in detection. We calculate theoretical expectations and characterize the performance of this scheme by simulations. Performing realistic simulations of point sources (PSs) in survey mode we search for spatial scales where the extended signal is uncontaminated by the PS flux. We derive a combination of scales and thresholds, which result in a clean extended source catalog. We design the output of the GC detection which enables calibrating the core-excised luminosity using external mass measurements. We provide a way to incorporate the results of this calibration in the production of final core-excised luminosity. Similarly to other GC detection pipelines, we sample the flux - core radius detection space of our method and find many similarities with the pipeline used in the 400d survey. Both detection methods require large statistics on compact GCs, in order to reduce the contamination from PSs. The benefit of our pipeline consists in the sensitivity to the outer GC shapes, which are characterized by large core sizes with little GC to GC variation at a fixed total mass. GC detection through cluster outskirts improves the GC characterization using eROSITA survey data and is expected to yield well characterized GC catalogs having simple selection functions.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.