Paper detail

Toward improving the visual stimulus meaning for increasing the P300 detection

The P300 speller is a well known Brain-Computer Interface paradigm that has been used for over two decades. A new P300 speller paradigm (XP300) is proposed. It includes several characteristics: (i) the items are not intensified by using rows and columns, (ii) the order of the visual stimuli is pseudo-random, (iii) a visual feedback is added on each item to increase the stimulus meaning, which is the main novelty. XP300 has been tested on ten healthy subjects on copy spelling mode, with only eight sensors. It has been compared with the classical P300 paradigm (CP300). With five repetitions, the average recognition rate across subjects is 85.25% for XP300 and 77.25% for CP300. Single-trial detection is significantly higher with XP300 by comparing the AUC (Area Under Curve) of the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve. The mean AUC is 0.86 for XP300, 0.80 for CP300. More importantly, XP300 has also been judged as more convenient and user-friendly than CP300, hence being able to allow longer sessions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.