Paper detail

Toward Generating Sufficiently Valid Test Case Results: A Method for Systematically Assigning Test Cases to Test Bench Configurations in a Scenario-Based Test Approach for Automated Vehicles

To successfully launch automated vehicles into the consumer market, there must be credible proof that the vehicles will operate safely. However, finding a method to validate the vehicles' safe operation is a challenging problem. While scenario-based test approaches seem to be possible solutions, they require execution of a large number of test cases. Several test benches, ranging from actual test vehicles to partly or fully simulated environments, are available to execute these test cases. Each test bench provides different elements, which in turn, have different parameters and parameter ranges. The composition of elements with their specific parameter values at a specific test bench that is used to execute a test case is referred to as a test bench configuration. However, selecting the most suitable test bench configuration is difficult. The selected test bench configuration determines whether the execution of a specific test case provides sufficiently valid test case results with respect to the intended purpose, for example, validating a vehicle's safe operation. The effective and efficient execution of a large number of test cases requires a method for systematically assigning test cases to the most suitable test bench configuration. Based on a proposed method for classifying test bench configurations, we propose and illustrate a method for systematically assigning test cases to test bench configurations in a scenario-based test approach for automated vehicles. This assignment method allows for the effective and efficient execution of a large number of test cases while generating sufficiently valid test case results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.