Paper detail

Toward first-principle simulations of galaxy formation: I. How should we choose star formation criteria in high-resolution simulations of disk galaxies?

We performed 3-dimensional N-body/SPH simulations to study how mass resolution and other model parameters such as the star formation efficiency parameter, C* and the threshold density, nth affect structures of the galactic gaseous/stellar disk in a static galactic potential. We employ 10^6 - 10^7 particles to resolve a cold and dense (T < 100 K & n_H > 100 cm^{-3}) phase. We found that structures of the ISM and the distribution of young stars are sensitive to the assumed nth. High-nth models with nth = 100 cm^{-3} yield clumpy multi-phase features in the ISM. Young stars are distributed in a thin disk of which half-mass scale height is 10 - 30 pc. In low-nth models with nth = 0.1 cm^{-3}, the stellar disk is found to be several times thicker, and the gas disk appears smoother than the high-nth models. A high-resolution simulation with high-nth is necessary to reproduce the complex structure of the gas disk. The global properties of the model galaxies in low-nth models, such as star formation histories, are similar to those in the high-nth models when we tune the value of C* so that they reproduce the observed relation between surface gas density and surface star formation rate density. We however emphasize that high-nth models automatically reproduce the relation, regardless of the values of C*. The ISM structure, phase distribution, and distributions of young star forming region are quite similar between two runs with values of C* which differ by a factor of 15. We also found that the timescale of the flow from n_H ~1 cm^{-3} to n_H > 100 cm^{-3} is about 5 times as long as the local dynamical time and is independent of the value of C*. The use of a high-nth criterion for star formation in high-resolution simulations makes numerical models fairy insensitive to the modelling of star formation. (Abridged)

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.