Paper detail

Toward Development of an Improved Friction Correlation for the Near-Wall Region of Pebble Bed Systems

The development of nuclear reactors that utilize pebble fuel has drastically increased the demand for improving the capabilities to simulate the packed beds found in these reactors. The complex flow fields found in a pebble bed make computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations time consuming and costly. Intermediate fidelity porous media models, however, are capable of approximating these flow fields in a much more computationally efficient manner. These models require the use of closures to capture the effects of complex flow phenomena without modeling them explicitly. This research employs data obtained from high-fidelity CFD simulations of a pebble bed to improve the drag closures used in porous media models in the near-wall region of the bed. Specifically, NekRS, a GPU-enabled spectral element CFD code, was used to simulate a bed of 1,568 pebbles at multiple Reynolds numbers. The case was divided into five concentric subdomains to extract radial profiles of the average porosity, velocity, and wall shear in each subdomain. A model consistent with the high-fidelity model was created in Idaho National Laboratory's Pronghorn porous media code and the KTA correlation was chosen as the drag closure of comparison. It was found that the KTA correlation overestimates the velocity in the near-wall region. An investigation of the drag coefficients between the two codes revealed that the KTA correlation underestimated the form factor in the outermost region while overestimating it in the inner four regions. This analysis in this work has revealed the underlying inaccuracy in the near-wall region of the KTA correlation and has set up the process for using high-fidelity simulation to predict more accurate drag coefficients a priori, rather than with a manual velocity-matching approach. This process will allow for the development of an improved drag closure for use in porous media models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.