Paper detail

Toward a standard Gamma Ray Burst: tight correlations between the prompt and the afterglow plateau phase emission

To reveal and understand astrophysical processes responsible for the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) phenomenon, it is crucial to discover and understand relations between their observational properties. The presented study is performed in the GRB rest frames and it uses a sample of 62 long GRBs from our sample of 77 Swift GRBs with known redshifts. Following the earlier analysis of the afterglow {\it characteristic luminosity $L^*_a$ -- break time $T^*_a$} correlation for a sample of long GRBs \citep{Dainotti2010} we extend it to correlations between the afterglow and the prompt emission GRB physical parameters. We reveal a tight physical scaling between the mentioned afterglow luminosity $ L^*_a$ and the prompt emission {\it mean} luminosity $<L^*_p>_{45} \equiv E_{iso}/T^*_{45}$. The distribution, with the Spearman correlation coefficient reaching 0.95 for the data subsample with most regular light curves, can be fitted with approximately $L^*_a \propto {<L^*_p>_{45}}^{0.7}$. We also analyzed correlations of $L^*_a$ with several other prompt emission parameters, including the isotropic energy $E_{iso}$, the peak energy in the $νF_ν$ spectrum, $E_{peak}$, and the variability parameter, $V$, defined by \cite{N000}. As a result, we reveal significant correlations also between these quantities, with an exception of the variability parameter. The main result of the present study is the discovery that the highest correlated GRB subsample in the \citet{Dainotti2010} afterglow analysis, for the GRBs with canonical X\,-\,ray light curves, leads also to the highest {\it prompt-afterglow} correlations and such events can be considered to form a sample of standard GRBs for astrophysics and cosmology.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.