Paper detail

Toward a concordance teleparallel Cosmology II: Linear perturbation

Late time cosmic acceleration may be achieved by modifying gravity on large scales. This should also have consequences on the evolution of perturbations. We thus extend our study of exponential infrared $f(T)$ teleparallel gravity to examine the viability of the theory at the linear perturbation level, evaluating the full CMB and matter power spectra. As the theory does not introduce extra free parameters, it fits within the minimal six parameter space of standard $Λ$CDM. Using Planck 2018 CMB (TT+TE+EE+lensing) alone, best fits predict those parameters to be almost identical to $Λ$CDM, with slightly smaller $χ^2_{min}$. The resulting $H_0=72.24\pm 0.64$ km/s/Mpc, which &#34;practically&#34; alleviates the tension with local measurements, due to late time phantom behaviour. Inclusion of BAO data however reduces $H_0$, reflecting furthermore systematic deviations from data that are also present in supernova distances and the growth rate of structure (increasing the apparent tension in the latter case). As the theory, unlike other viable $f(T)$ models, does not reduce to $Λ$CDM through extra free parameters, those conclusions are generic; applying to any modified gravity or dynamical dark energy with phantom behaviour. With best fit parameters, the present scenario produces a CMB spectrum almost identical to $Λ$CDM, with slight deviation at low-multipole $\ell < 30$, where cosmic variance is large. The matter power spectrum is also quite close to $Λ$CDM; with percent level scale free modifications affecting modes significantly smaller than the horizon, arising primarily from modified background evolution. More significant deviations appear on larger scales, and may in principle distinguish modified gravity scenarios of the type studied here from dynamical dark energy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.