Paper detail

Torsion functions and the Cheeger problem: a fractional approach

Let $Ω$ be a Lipschitz bounded domain of $\mathbb{R}^N $, $N\geq2$. The fractional Cheeger constant $h_s (Ω)$, $0<s<1$, is defined by \[h_s(Ω)=\inf_{E\subsetΩ}\frac{P_s(E)}{|E|},\: \text{ where } \: P_s (E)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^N }\int_{\mathbb{R}^N }\frac{|χ_{E}(x)-χ_{E}(y)|}{|x-y|^{N+s}} dx dy,\] with $χ_{E}$ denoting the characteristic function of the smooth subdomain $E$. The main purpose of this paper is to show that \[\lim_{p\rightarrow1^+}\left|ϕ_p^s\right|_{L^{\infty}(Ω)}^{1-p}=h_s (Ω)=\lim_{p\rightarrow1^+}\left|ϕ_p^s\right|_{L^1(Ω)}^{1-p},\] where $ϕ_p^s$ is the fractional $(s,p)$-torsion function of $Ω$, that is, the solution of the Dirichlet problem for the fractional $p$-Laplacian: $-(Δ)_p^s\,u=1$ in $Ω$, $u=0$ in $\mathbb{R}^N \setminusΩ$. For this, we derive suitable bounds for the first eigenvalue $λ_{1,p}^s(Ω)$ of the fractional $p$-Laplacian operator in terms of $ϕ_p^s$. We also show that $ϕ_p^s$ minimizes the $(s,p)$-Gagliardo seminorm in $\mathbb{R}^N $, among the functions normalized by the $L^1$-norm.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.