Paper detail

Topology from the Simulated Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We measure the topology (genus curve) of the galaxy distribution in a mock redshift catalog designed to resemble the upcoming Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). The catalog, drawn from a large N-body simulation of a Lambda-CDM cos- mological model, mimics the anticipated spectroscopic selection procedures of the SDSS in some detail. Sky maps, redshift slices, and 3-D contour maps of the mock survey reveal a rich and complex structure, including networks of voids and superclusters that resemble the patterns seen in the CfA redshift survey and the Las Campanas Redshift Survey (LCRS). The 3-D genus curve can be measured from the simulated catalog with superb precision; this curve has the general shape predicted for Gaussian, random phase initial conditions, but the error bars are small enough to demonstrate with high significance the subtle departures from this shape caused by non-linear gravitational evolution. These distortions have the form predicted by Matsubara's (1994) perturbative anal- ysis, but they are much smaller in amplitude. We also measure the 3-D genus curve of the radial peculiar velocity field measured by applying distance- indicator relations (with realistic errors) to the mock catalog. This genus curve is consistent with the Gaussian random phase prediction, though it is of relatively low precision because of the large smoothing length required to overcome noise in the measured velocity field. Finally, we measure the 2-D topology in redshift slices, similar to early slices from the SDSS and to slices already observed in the LCRS. The genus curves of these slices are consistent with the observed genus curves of the LCRS, providing further evidence in favor of the inflationary CDM model with Omega_M~0.4. The catalog is publicly available at http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~dhw/sdss.html.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.