Paper detail

Topologies on unparameterised path space

The signature of a path, introduced by K.T. Chen [5] in $1954$, has been extensively studied in recent years. The $2010$ paper [12] of Hambly and Lyons showed that the signature is injective on the space of continuous finite-variation paths up to a general notion of reparameterisation called tree-like equivalence. The signature has been widely used in applications, underpinned by the result [15] that guarantees uniform approximation of a continuous function on a compact set by a linear functional of the signature. We study in detail, and for the first time, the properties of three candidate topologies on the set of unparameterised paths (the tree-like equivalence classes). These are obtained through properties of the signature and are: (1) the product topology, obtained by equipping the tensor algebra with the product topology and requiring $S$ to be an embedding, (2) the quotient topology derived from the 1-variation topology on the underlying path space, and (3) the metric topology associated to $d( [ γ] ,[ σ] ) := \vert\vert γ^*-σ^*\vert\vert_{1}$ using suitable representatives $γ^*$ and $σ^*$ of the equivalence classes. The topologies are ordered by strict inclusion, (1) being the weakest and (3) the strongest. Each is separable and Hausdorff, (1) being both metrisable and $σ$-compact, but not a Baire space and so neither Polish nor locally compact. The quotient topology (2) is not metrisable and the metric $d$ is not complete. An important function on (unparameterised) path space is the (fixed-time) solution map of a controlled differential equation. For a broad class of such equations, we prove measurability of this map for each topology. Under stronger regularity assumptions, we show continuity on explicit compact subsets of the product topology (1). We relate these results to the expected signature model of [15].

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.