Paper detail

Topologically close-packed phases in binary transition-metal compounds: matching high-throughput ab initio calculations to an empirical structure map

In steels and single-crystal superalloys the control of the formation of topologically close-packed (TCP) phases is critical for the performance of the material. The structural stability of TCP phases in multi-component transition-metal alloys may be rationalised in terms of the average valence-electron count $\bar{N}$ and the composition-dependent relative volume-difference $\overline{ΔV/V}$. We elucidate the interplay of these factors by comparing density-functional theory calculations to an empirical structure map based on experimental data. In particular, we calculate the heat of formation for the TCP phases A15, C14, C15, C36, $χ$, $μ$, and $σ$ for all possible binary occupations of the Wyckoff positions. We discuss the isovalent systems V/Nb-Ta to highlight the role of atomic-size difference and observe the expected stabilisation of C14/C15/C36/$μ$ by $\overline{ΔV/V}$ at $ΔN=0$ in V-Ta. In the systems V/Nb-Re, we focus on the well-known trend of A15$- σ- χ$ stability with increasing $\bar{N}$ and show that the influence of $\overline{ΔV/V}$ is too weak to stabilise C14/C15/C36/$μ$ in Nb-Re. As an example for a significant influence of both $\bar{N}$ and $\overline{ΔV/V}$, we also consider the systems Cr/Mo-Co. Here the sequence A15$- σ- χ$ is observed in both systems but in Mo-Co the large size-mismatch stabilises C14/C15/C36/$μ$. We also include V/Nb-Co that cover the entire valence range of TCP stability and also show the stabilisation of C14/C15/C36/$μ$. Moreover, the combination of a large volume difference with a large mismatch in valence-electron count reduces the stability of the A15/$σ$/$χ$ phases in Nb-Co as compared to V-Co. By comparison to non-magnetic calculations we also find that magnetism is of minor importance for the structural stability of TCP phases in Cr/Mo-Co and in V/Nb-Co.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.