Paper detail

Topological representations

This paper studies the combinatorics of ideals which recently appeared in ergodicity results for analytic equivalence relations. The ideals have the following topological representation. There is a separable metrizable space $X$, a $σ$-ideal $I$ on $X$ and a dense countable subset $D$ of $X$ such that the ideal consists of those subsets of $D$ whose closure belongs to $I$. It turns out that this definition is indepedent of the choice of $D$. We show that an ideal is of this form if and only if it is dense and countably separated. The latter is a variation of a notion introduced by Todor\vcević for gaps. As a corollary, we get that this class is invariant under the Rudin--Blass equivalence. This also implies that the space $X$ can be always chosen to be compact so that $I$ is a $σ$-ideal of compact sets. We compute the possible descriptive complexities of such ideals and conclude that all analytic equivalence relations induced by such ideals are $\mathbfΠ^0_3$. We also prove that a coanalytic ideal is an intersection of ideals of this form if and only if it is weakly selective.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.